Tuesday Feb 7, 2012 
Cost/Benefit Analysis [2010]

A comparison of the costs and benefits of use between the bitted bridle and the crossunder bitless bridle.


 

If a riders goal is to compete in dressage & certain other disciplines under present day rules, a bitted bridle is unavoidable. It is mandated by the FEI, most national equestrian federations, Pony Clubs and 4H organizations. This in spite of the fact that a bit adds to the risk of accidents, increases the cost of keeping a horse and leads to disappointment and frustration on the part of the rider. For the horse, a bit is a scourge that lowers its quality of life.

A more humane and safer alternative to the bit has been available for a decade. If a riders goal is the welfare, safety and happiness of her horse and herself, rather than to compete, a crossunder bitless bridle is the bridle of choice. The satisfaction of a achieving a higher level of performance is an added bonus.

The advantages and disadvantages of the bitted bridle compared with the crossunder bitless bridle (CBB), tabulated in a cost/benefit analysis of each method that considers the question from 19 different aspects, reveals the following result.

The bit has only 2 benefits out of a possible 19, the CBB has 17 benefits out of 19. Conversely, the bit has 19:19 costs and the CBB only 2:19. Both of the two CBB costs arise because of competition rules that have not yet been updated to permit the crossunder bitless bridle.

Click here to see the full analysis.

Website Content and Material by Dr. Robert Cook F.R.C.V.S., Ph.D. Copyright 2000 - 2009 by The Bitless Bridle, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Website Hosting by Flash Avenue
^Secured by phase
www.phase.com content customer branding phase branding customer